Send Both Sides a video, an article or a question. It checks each point against sources you can open, argues every side at its strongest, and tells you where its own answer might lean.
Free in early access · invite-only for now · iPhone and web
A real check, shortened. It found the claims people make on each side, checked them, and laid out three positions — not two — because there really are three.
In the world's largest trial, almost every company stuck with the four-day week afterwards.
Accurate as reported: 56 of 61 UK firms (92%) said they would continue. But they volunteered, were coached, and had no control group — it measures their choice, not whether output held up.
The health benefits are now proven by peer-reviewed science.
A 2025 Nature Human Behaviour study of 2,896 workers in 141 organisations found less burnout and better health. Limits: self-reported, six months, firms opted in.
Iceland proved a whole country can move to a four-day week.
Iceland's trials cut the week from 40 hours to 35–36 — not four days. Researchers say the four-day framing greatly overstates what was tested.
Burnout is a real harm, and productivity gains should show up as time, not only pay.
The predicted collapse in output keeps failing to appear, and 92% of trial firms chose to keep it.
Thin-margin businesses — restaurants, care homes — can't absorb a fifth fewer hours.
Nearly all the evidence comes from self-selected firms with no randomly assigned control group.
Workers deserve leverage to ask, without one rule for every industry.
It's the version actually on the books — Belgium's 2022 right to request — and lets evidence build sector by sector.
The pro side has a peer-reviewed study and large pilots; much of the critical case is methodological commentary — an imbalance that may reflect who funds research rather than who is right. I ran out of searches before checking long-run follow-ups and costed national estimates.
Someone sends you a clip. It's confident, it's emotional, and it might be true. Both Sides listens to it, pulls out the points a viewer walks away believing, and checks each one against what's actually on the record. Then it sets out the sides of the issue — the heart and the logic of each — so you can make up your own mind.
It started with a simple wish — to see both sides of a story, with context for every point the person telling it makes — and the worry that comes with it: that the AI doing the explaining might be biased too. Both Sides is built to answer both.
Eight verdicts, and only eight. Anything else the AI wants to say becomes “can't verify.” A source without a real link is dropped. A quote has to be words that were actually said.
Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, LinkedIn, Threads. It listens to the audio and checks what's said, with the minute it was said.
Paste a link to any article, or a whole block of text, and every main claim gets checked.
“Give me both sides of the immigration debate.” It maps the debate itself: the claims each side makes, and what the record shows.
Quoted exactly, given one verdict from a fixed list, explained in a few sentences, with sources you can open.
Every side gets what its people value and fear, and its strongest argument — the way its most thoughtful supporters would put it.
Pick a side and get its best case: the evidence, the objections you'll hear, honest answers, and the weak points not to lean on.
Getting ready for a conversation with someone who sees it differently: where you agree, what to ask, what shuts it down.
What the sides share, and the compromises people across the divide have actually proposed.
Ask anything about a check — “explain this to a teenager,” “what would change each side's mind?”
One link, with previews in Messages, WhatsApp and Facebook. The analysis travels; your transcripts and text stay private.
On iPhone, tap Share → Both Sides on any post or article. On a computer, one bookmark does the same.
Every check ends by saying where it might itself lean, and what it couldn't check.
Paid plans will be announced here before anyone is charged. No card is needed now.
The app, with “Share → Both Sides” on any post or article. Early testers get it through TestFlight; the App Store listing is coming.
Ask to be a testerOn a computer, one bookmark sends whatever you're reading to Both Sides — it fills in the link and waits for you to tap.
Set it up in the appBoth Sides is invite-only for now. Signing in is your email and a six-digit code — no password.
It can be — that's the worry Both Sides was built around. So it's built to be checkable, not trusted: every quote is real words from the source, every verdict comes from a fixed list, every source is a link you can open, every side gets equal care, and each check ends with its own fairness check. If a check gets something wrong, the sources will show it.
No. It tells you what the record shows on each factual claim, labels opinions as opinions, and lays out each side at its strongest. Deciding is yours.
A link to a video post (Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, LinkedIn, Threads), a link to an article, a block of text, or a plain question. YouTube links sometimes fail because YouTube refuses some requests. Posts shared only with friends or followers can't be opened.
It listens to the audio. It can't see on-screen text or images, and it says so in every check of a video.
A question or an article takes two to four minutes. A video takes about as long as the video, plus a minute or two. You can leave and come back; it will be waiting.
Your checks are private to you unless you share one. Audio is deleted as soon as it's transcribed. You can delete any check, or your whole account, from inside the app. The privacy policy has the details.
Anthropic's Claude, with live web search, so it can check claims against what's published now rather than only what it remembers.
Yes, while Both Sides is in early access. Pricing will be announced here before anyone is ever charged.
Questions, ideas, something that went wrong, or a request to join. If it's a problem, say what you sent and what you expected instead — that's almost always enough to fix it.